![]() Gabriel Sterling, COO of the Ga SoS’s office, whom was a private contractor not subject to open records request during the election, claimed that the county ordered 1.1 million mail-in/emergency provisional ballots because they weren’t sure the L&A testing would be completed on time due to a “de minimis” software update done days before in-person voting began. that none of the machines were tested prior to in-person voting. įurthermore, there is evidence received from Fulton Co. ![]() The ICX BMDs that are mentioned in this report were *not* tested individually. According to my interview with Bridget Thorne, the L&A testing was not properly conducted as only the scanners were each tested. Ensure that ImageCast X and the Election Management System (EMS) are not connected to any external (i.e., Internet accessible) networks.Īt best, Logic and Accuracy testing, which is statutorily mandated to be conducted prior to elections with notice given to the public to observe, took place on only a small fraction of the machines. If a paper trail and chain of custody records is the “safety procedures” that are meant to reduce the risk of these exploitations, well, we have a major problem in the state of Georgia because the paper trail is practically non-existent. Ballot drop box transfer forms missing, forged or illegally duplicated. ![]() Access by private parties on their own personal laptops to the E-Net system in Georgia (election registration database). No zero tapes provided from open records requests. One of the investigators I’ve been working with on all of this in the state of Georgia once told me “election records in Fulton Co and neighboring counties are so bad that it has to be deliberate.” Why would he say something like that? Because election records are beyond disheveled. Ensure compliance with chain of custody procedures throughout the election cycle. That hasn’t stopped patriots like Ashe Epps, Holly Kasun and Shawn Smith from investigating this further and orchestrating at least three reports on the Mesa, CO findings. of State Jena Griswold has passed a “law” forbidding third party audits of the elections, we may never know the significance of those files “officially”. In that “Trusted Build,” it is alleged that tens of thousands of files were erroneously deleted. This recommendation drew scrutiny from Halderman himself in the AP article when Halderman said “no one but Dominion has had the opportunity to assess their asserted fixes.” We have all hopefully heard of the “trusted build” that was installed in Mesa, CO, resulting in the subsequent arrest of clerk Tina Peters for dutifully making a back up copy of the system prior to the update (standard accounting procedure in ANY industry, especially when there is a federal law mandating their preservation). Dominion Voting Systems reports to CISA that the above vulnerabilities have been addressed in subsequent software versions. In this article, we will deal with each applicable mitigation bullet point CISA makes individually: - Contact Dominion Voting Systems to determine which software and/or firmware updates need to be applied. However, the “mitigations” listed at the bottom of the advisory suggest the statement that “CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any election” is based on little, if any, investigation into what actually happened in the 2020 election in the state of Georgia. Upon initial analysis of the technical aspects of the advisory, it’s essentially Greek to me. Raffensperger case that has been on going since 2019. To much scrutiny, it was sealed by Federal Judge Amy Totenberg in the Curling v. The 96 page report allegedly shows numerous vulnerabilities in the Dominion Democracy Suite ImageCast X (ICX) ballot marking devices (BMDs). ![]() ![]() We finally have an official response from CISA to the sealed report drafted by Univ. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |